This course focuses on decision making in the context of urban planning for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These are considered a universal set of 17 goals, 169 targets to be achieved by the year 2030. The New Urban Agenda (NUA) provides guidance for achieving the Agenda2030 SDGs and the Paris Agreement on climate change (COP21) at urban level. There are many potential overlaps in the goals, targets and indicators of the SDGs and the NUA: first and foremost, the SDGs include the dedicated urban Goal 11 – “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable”. The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights the importance metrics and indicators have for decision-making. To make decisions, generally one should know the pros and cons about alternatives toward a goal. With reference to the NUA, our alternatives are the different ways one may plan, design, manage, transform, and think about cities. To improve decision-making process based on public participation is an imperative for cities considering the need to have fully integration of socio-economic and environmental issues. The course deals specifically with the following major themes: Global Urban Agenda and UN Agenda2030; Sustainable development at district, urban and regional level; decision making process, including tools, methods and approaches; effect of climate change and quality of life to urban form, including density, size, accessibility. Particular attention will be paid to university campus as demonstrator and living lab, thus generating a significant impact on decision making processes at urban and regional level. The methodology recalled by the ULab will be experimented, for Transforming Business, Self and Society to facilitate people through a process of change and shared decision making processes.
The course focuses on the decision-making process in the context of urban and territorial planning for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) proposed by the United Nations Agenda 2030. These are considered a universal set of 17 goals, 169 targets to be achieved by the year 2030. The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development highlights the importance metrics and indicators have for decision-making. To improve decision-making process based on public participation is an imperative for cities considering the need to have fully integration of socio-economic and environmental issues. Specific attention is paid to systemic and multidisciplinary approaches. Furthermore, we analyze the trade offs and synergies that objective 11, aimed at "Making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable", has with other objectives and, in particular with SDGs 7 (Energy), 12 (Circular economy), 13 (Climate change).
All theoretical topics are intertwined with workshops and interactive sessions carried out within smaller groups of students.
The university campus and the city of Turin case studies are used as demonstrators and virtual laboratories, to visualize the practical impact of the decision-making processes studied at the urban district level.
At the end of the course students will be able to afford the following tasks: - to understand and link scientific knowledge with policies and decisions making at urban level; - to analyze the pro and cons of alternatives toward urban sustainable goals; - to link decision making and sustainable urban development with the paradigm of complexity and interdisciplinary; - to apply in real case studies sustainable development actions.
At the end of the course students will be able to afford the following tasks:
- to understand and link scientific knowledge with policies and decisions making at urban level;
- to analyze the pro and cons of alternatives toward urban sustainable goals;
- to link decision making and sustainable urban development with the paradigm of complexity and interdisciplinary;
- to apply in real case studies sustainable development actions.
none
none
The program of the course is articulated according to the following macro-themes: - Global Urban Agenda; - Sustainable Development Goals; - Sustainable Urban Forms; - Multicriteria Analysis; - Indicators (including KPI) and urban protocols; - Complexity; - Climate Change; - Quality of Life; - Spatial Analysis, - social science, -design thinking, - Social Innovation.
The program of the course is articulated according to the following macro-themes:
1. Theory and practice on Sustainable development
• Agenda 2030
• SDGs interactions
• Nexus Issues - Energy, Water, Food
• Climate Change / Energy Transition
• Circular economy
2. Decision making under complexity and uncertainty
• Human Decision Making
• Wicked Problems – Inelegant solutions
• Causality
3. Methods / Approaches in Environmental Economics and Policy
• Cost Benefit Analysis / Return on Investment
• Willingness to Pay / Discrete Choice Experiments / Contingent Valuation
• Ecosystem Services Valuation
4. Participatory Methods and Foresight methods
• Role of public participation.
• Online foresight models, Expert Opinion / Delphi Model, Big Data, etc.
• Storytelling methods
• Serious games
5. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Methods and GIS-based decision support systems
• Multi attribute Utility/Value Theory
• Multi Criteria Evaluation
• Methods: AHP/ANP; Promethee, ELECTRE, Playing cards
Although all the 17SDGs will be mentioned and analyzed, considering the UN Agenda2030 focus of this course, major attention will be paid to the following urban context related SDGs: 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17.
Although all the 17SDGs will be mentioned and analyzed, considering the UN Agenda2030 focus of this course, major attention will be paid to the following urban context related SDGs: 3, 7, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17.
A number of workshops, individual and group presentations and exercises will occur, plus a final assignment. The course will rhythmically alternate theoretical lectures from the teacher and interactive discussions with students as well as students presentations of subject voluntarily chosen.
A number of workshops, individual and group presentations and exercises will occur, plus a final assignment. The course will rhythmically alternate theoretical lectures from the teacher and interactive discussions with students as well as students presentations of subject voluntarily chosen.
Yosef Rafeq Jabareen (2006). Sustainable Urban Forms: Their Typologies, Models, and Concepts. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26: 38
SALAT S., Cities and Forms: On Sustainable Urbanism, Editions Hermann, Paris, 2011.
BRANDON P.S., LOMBARDI P., Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built Environment, II Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (USA) 2005, pp. 272, (II edition 2011)
COOP AFRICA, Project Design Manual. A Step-by-Step Tool to Support the Development of Cooperatives and Other Forms of Self-Help Organization, International Labour Organization, I.L.O., Genève, 2010, (web pdf)
FIGUERIA J., GRECO S., EHRGOTT M. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art, Springer, Berlin 2010
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Folke, C. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature News, 534(7607), 320.
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth's Future, 5(11), 1169-1179.
Spangenberg, J. H. (2017). Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 311-321.
Reckien, D., Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Lwasa, S., Tovar-Restrepo, M., McEvoy, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2017). Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban perspective. Environment and urbanization, 29(1), 159-182.
Sonetti, G., & Lombardi, P. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals and Current Sustainability Actions at Politecnico di Torino. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development (pp. 247-264). Springer, Cham.
Sonetti, G., Brown, M., & Naboni, E. (2019). About the Triggering of UN Sustainable Development Goals and Regenerative Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability, 11(1), 254.
Sonetti, G., Lombardi, P., & Chelleri, L. (2016). True green and sustainable university campuses? Toward a clusters approach. Sustainability, 8(1), 83.
Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Learning from the future as it emerges. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Lombardi, P., & Sonetti, G. (Eds.). (2017). News from the Front of Sustainable University Campuses. Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
Main websites:
http://unsdsn.org
http://asvis.it
https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/BP_8.2016.pdf
http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/Opportunities%20for%20the%20New%20Urban%20Agenda.pdf
https://unhabitat.org/new-urban-agenda-and-the-sustainable-development-goals-to-human-rights-brochure/
https://isocarp.org/app/uploads/2016/09/Keynote_Watson.pdf
https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/roadmap_for_localizing_the_sdgs_0.pdf
http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/eau/28/1
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en/project/implementing-new-urban-agenda-and-sustainable-development-goals-comparative-urban
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en/project/pilot-project-test-potential-targets-and-indicators-urban-sustainable-development-goal
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/sites/mistraurbanfutures.org/files/simon_et_al_2016_developing_and_testing_the_urban_sdg_targets_and_indicators_-_comparative_study_envir_urbanization_281.pdf
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17535069.2016.1275618
http://www.columbia.edu/~jk2002/publications/Klopp17.pdf
http://wuf9.org/
SALAT S., Cities and Forms: On Sustainable Urbanism, Editions Hermann, Paris, 2011.
BRANDON P.S., LOMBARDI P., Evaluating Sustainable Development in the Built Environment, II Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken (USA) 2011
Campbell, Harry; Brown, Richard (2003). Benefit–Cost Analysis: Financial and Economic Appraisal Using Spreadsheets. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-82146-9.
Pearce, D. 1998, ‘Cost–benefit analysis and environmental policy’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 84–100.
Pearce, Atkinson, G. and Mourato, S. 2006, Cost–Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments, Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development, Paris.
Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E.B. 1989, Blueprint for a Green Economy, London Environmental Economics Centre, London.
COOP AFRICA, Project Design Manual. A Step-by-Step Tool to Support the Development of Cooperatives and Other Forms of Self-Help Organization, International Labour Organization, I.L.O., Genève, 2010, (web pdf)
FIGUERIA J., GRECO S., EHRGOTT M. (eds), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art, Springer, Berlin 2010
H. Meadows «Thinking in Systems» (Italian: «Pensare per Sistemi») Published December 3rd 2008 by Chelsea Green Publishing
Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., ... & Folke, C. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855.
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016). Policy: map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature News, 534(7607), 320.
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017). A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth's Future, 5(11), 1169-1179.
Spangenberg, J. H. (2017). Hot air or comprehensive progress? A critical assessment of the SDGs. Sustainable Development, 25(4), 311-321.
Reckien, D., Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Lwasa, S., Tovar-Restrepo, M., McEvoy, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2017). Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban perspective. Environment and urbanization, 29(1), 159-182.
Sonetti, G., & Lombardi, P. (2020). Sustainable Development Goals and Current Sustainability Actions at Politecnico di Torino. In Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development (pp. 247-264). Springer, Cham.
Keeney R.L., Raiffa H., 1976, Decisions with multiple Objectives, Preferencesand Value Tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York
Voogd H., 1983, Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning, Pion, London
Zeleney M. (1982), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw Hill, NY.
T.Saaty, 1996, The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, revision 2001.
Reports to be downloaded:
- Agenda 2030 – ONU (Download)
- “Global warming of 1.5°C” – IPCC (download)
- “European Green Deal” – European Commission (download)
- “Sustainable Development Report 2020” – SDSN (Download download)
- “Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) Situation Report – 176” – WHO (download)
- “Six transformations” – Sachs et al. (download)
- “Sustainable Development Report, Mediterranean Countries Edition 2019 – SDSN Mediterranean (download)
MOOCs
- Age of Sustainable Development (course link)
- Global Public Health (course link)
- Planetary boundaries (course link)
- Sustainable Food Systems: a Mediterranean Perspective” (course link)
Main websites:
http://unsdsn.org
http://asvis.it
https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/BP_8.2016.pdf
http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/Opportunities%20for%20the%20New%20Urban%20Agenda.pdf
https://unhabitat.org/new-urban-agenda-and-the-sustainable-development-goals-to-human-rights-brochure/
https://isocarp.org/app/uploads/2016/09/Keynote_Watson.pdf
https://www.uclg.org/sites/default/files/roadmap_for_localizing_the_sdgs_0.pdf
http://journals.sagepub.com/toc/eau/28/1
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en/project/implementing-new-urban-agenda-and-sustainable-development-goals-comparative-urban
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/en/project/pilot-project-test-potential-targets-and-indicators-urban-sustainable-development-goal
https://www.mistraurbanfutures.org/sites/mistraurbanfutures.org/files/simon_et_al_2016_developing_and_testing_the_urban_sdg_targets_and_indicators_-_comparative_study_envir_urbanization_281.pdf
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17535069.2016.1275618
http://www.columbia.edu/~jk2002/publications/Klopp17.pdf
http://wuf9.org/
Modalità di esame: Prova orale obbligatoria; Elaborato grafico prodotto in gruppo; Prova scritta tramite l'utilizzo di vLAIB e piattaforma di ateneo;
The exams is consisting of three parts as follows.
An individual written test. The written test is based on SULITEST. Students will have 30min (about 2 min for each multiple choices question proposed) for completing the test. This test is proposed for checking students' progress in understanding sustainable development main subjects and main issues.
An exam is developed for each individual. Each student will be asked for 2 questions related to evaluation methodologies and approaches, including systems thinking approaches.
A portfoglio. The presentation of a portfoglio which includes all workshops results and classroom exercises is also mandatory. This will show applications of the methods and theories explained during the course.
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Group graphic design project; Written test via vLAIB using the PoliTo platform;
The exams is consisting of three parts as follows.
An individual written test. The written test is based on SULITEST. Students will have 30min (about 2 min for each multiple choices question proposed) for completing the test. This test is proposed for checking students' progress in understanding sustainable development main subjects and main issues.
An exam is developed for each individual. Each student will be asked for 2 questions related to evaluation methodologies and approaches, including systems thinking approaches.
A portfoglio. The presentation of a portfoglio which includes all workshops results and classroom exercises is also mandatory. This will show applications of the methods and theories explained during the course.
Modalità di esame: Prova orale obbligatoria; Prova scritta tramite l'utilizzo di vLAIB e piattaforma di ateneo; Elaborato progettuale in gruppo;
The exams is consisting of three parts as follows.
An individual written test. The written test is based on SULITEST. Students will have 30min (about 2 min for each multiple choices question proposed) for completing the test. This test is proposed for checking students' progress in understanding sustainable development main subjects and main issues.
An exam is developed for each individual. Each student will be asked for 2 questions related to evaluation methodologies and approaches, including systems thinking approaches.
A portfoglio. The presentation of a portfoglio which includes all workshops results and classroom exercises is also mandatory. This will show applications of the methods and theories explained during the course.
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Written test via vLAIB using the PoliTo platform; Group project;
The exams is consisting of three parts as follows.
An individual written test. The written test is based on SULITEST. Students will have 30min (about 2 min for each multiple choices question proposed) for completing the test. This test is proposed for checking students' progress in understanding sustainable development main subjects and main issues.
An exam is developed for each individual. Each student will be asked for 2 questions related to evaluation methodologies and approaches, including systems thinking approaches.
A portfoglio. The presentation of a portfoglio which includes all workshops results and classroom exercises is also mandatory. This will show applications of the methods and theories explained during the course.