This Atelier deals with the fruition, management and enhancement design of sites of cultural interest, through the interdisciplinary contribution of Interior Architecture, Real Estate Appraisal and Geomatics. Design integrates the studies developed by each disciplinary tradition and focused on environmental, monumental or diffuse pre-existences, linked to cultural and recreational activities. Within the Atelier, using the interpretative tools of representation, the student engages in the stratification of the pre-existence, investigating it through the collection of cognitive data, the reading of the context, the identification of strategies of enhancement, communication and management aimed at improving its use.
At the end of the Atelier, the student will acquire a greater awareness of the multiplicity of approaches and disciplinary elements required to interpret the complexity of a site of cultural interest and a project theme oriented to frame long-term sustainable strategies.
This Atelier deals with the fruition, management and enhancement design of sites of cultural interest, through the interdisciplinary contribution of Interior Architecture, Real Estate Appraisal and Geomatics. Design integrates the studies developed by each disciplinary tradition and focused on environmental, monumental or diffuse pre-existences, linked to cultural and recreational activities. Within the Atelier, using the interpretative tools of representation, the student engages in the stratification of the pre-existence, investigating it through the collection of cognitive data, the reading of the context, the identification of strategies of enhancement, communication and management aimed at improving its use.
At the end of the Atelier, the student will acquire a greater awareness of the multiplicity of approaches and disciplinary elements required to interpret the complexity of a site of cultural interest and a project theme oriented to frame long-term sustainable strategies.
Knowledge of the theoretical and technical aspects related to Interior Architecture Design and Museography;
ability in setting up, with methodological rigor, the propaedeutic phase with methodological rigor. This is related to the understanding of the processes behind the current structure of the heritage, and the context in its material and immaterial components;
understanding of the design criteria of a GIS platform to link needed information and to simulate the project effects, both on a local scale and in wider territorial environments;
knowledge and ability in managing the interdisciplinary aspects of the architectural design (formal, functional, social, economic, communicative).
Students who pass the exam must have acquired:
- Ability in recognizing the qualities of the built heritage, its structures and spatial sequences, physical and visual relationships with pre-existing buildings and contextual elements.
- Ability in mastering the design tools for the intervention on the heritage, at the different scales and with specific attention to the internal-external and internal-internal relations.
- Ability in elaborating enhancement strategies, consistent with the asset and the context.
- Ability in communicating the project at the appropriate scale, with graphic quality and using the most suitable tools.
- Ability in identifying the target users and in identifying functional segments related to cultural activities in response to these demand segments
- Critical ability in applying investment analysis tools in a management key/approach and in setting the asset management project at different scales with methodological correctness, effectively managing the tools for verifying feasibility and controlling management performance.- Ability in finding information as requested by projects, in locating them correctly in the territorial context at the different scales of investigation and tin inserting them in a relational structure, as needed both in designing and in evaluating the impacts process.
Knowledge of the theoretical and technical aspects related to Interior Architecture Design and Museography;
ability in setting up, with methodological rigor, the propaedeutic phase with methodological rigor. This is related to the understanding of the processes behind the current structure of the heritage, and the context in its material and immaterial components;
understanding of the design criteria of a GIS platform to link needed information and to simulate the project effects, both on a local scale and in wider territorial environments;
knowledge and ability in managing the interdisciplinary aspects of the architectural design (formal, functional, social, economic, communicative).
Students who pass the exam must have acquired:
- Ability in recognizing the qualities of the built heritage, its structures and spatial sequences, physical and visual relationships with pre-existing buildings and contextual elements.
- Ability in mastering the design tools for the intervention on the heritage, at the different scales and with specific attention to the internal-external and internal-internal relations.
- Ability in elaborating enhancement strategies, consistent with the asset and the context.
- Ability in communicating the project at the appropriate scale, with graphic quality and using the most suitable tools.
- Ability in identifying the target users and in identifying functional segments related to cultural activities in response to these demand segments
- Critical ability in applying investment analysis tools in a management key/approach and in setting the asset management project at different scales with methodological correctness, effectively managing the tools for verifying feasibility and controlling management performance.- Ability in finding information as requested by projects, in locating them correctly in the territorial context at the different scales of investigation and tin inserting them in a relational structure, as needed both in designing and in evaluating the impacts process.
The student must have an adequate personal preparation and knowledge deriving from having passed the exams in the areas of Architectural Design, Restoration, Architectural Drawing, Real Estate Appraisal, as provided in the three-year Bachelor in Architecture (Class L-17).
In relation to the program within the Master of Science, the student must have the knowledge deriving from having passed Architectural Design, Real Estate Appraisal and Restoration exams. By dealing with the enhancement and use of sites of cultural and recreational interest, any sociological knowledge is an important, additional element.
The student must have an adequate personal preparation and knowledge deriving from having passed the exams in the areas of Architectural Design, Restoration, Architectural Drawing, Real Estate Appraisal, as provided in the three-year Bachelor in Architecture (Class L-17).
In relation to the program within the Master of Science, the student must have the knowledge deriving from having passed Architectural Design, Real Estate Appraisal and Restoration exams. By dealing with the enhancement and use of sites of cultural and recreational interest, any sociological knowledge is an important, additional element.
...
The atelier provides for the development of a design action aimed at enhancing and redeveloping a particular historical, archaeological context and monumental, focused on the use and management of a newly defined museum complex. The design process includes:
- knowledge of the site and the detailed acquisition of existing information
- development of design proposal with particular reference to the definition of the museum itinerary, the sequence and structure of the spaces, and their preparation from a museography point of view
- The application of sustainable management models by the relationship between target use and economic investment strategies.
INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE
The final result intends to be a project developed with full awareness of the methods and techniques of intervention on the historical, archaeological heritage in which the objectives of protection and enhancement can be pursued with specific attention to the peculiarities of the pre-existence, its shape, its stratification, and its fruition and communicational potential.
From a functional point of view, the destination will be a museum. It will require an integrated intervention of rehabilitation of the spaces involved in the exhibition path: floor layers, redesign of the roof, redefinition of the liminal surfaces, and the ostensive exhibition detail, which contribute to their together with the perception of layered sequences of relationships between ruin and new intervention.
The design action will progressively deal with some themes that have assumed conceptual and methodological priority over time in the architectural project for archaeology and heritage. Between these:
TRUTH's recognition as understanding the stratification and environmental schedules as a legible expression of the coexistence of codes, languages, and physical textures.
- The recognition of BEAUTY as a categorical imperative and maximum tension for the architectural project in a historical and ancient context.
- The knowledge of PARADIGMS, that is, of the reference architectures that have played a role in modelling and resolving specific problems of the rehabilitation project of archaeological and monumental pre-existing structures.
- Knowledge of REVERSIBILITY, understood: mental predisposition at the level of design thinking and under the technological and figurative one. As a field choice for sustainable design in an archaeological environment, as a challenge to the complexity of updating the historical and ancient heritage.
- The problem of the formal and material CONTINUITY / DISCONTINUITY relationship between old and new and the consequent strategic choice between EXTRUDED STRUCTURE and INDEPENDENT STRUCTURE.
- The problem of MONUMENTALIZATION OF PROTECTION, and therefore of the construction of large roofs and large internal spaces capable of protecting entire archaeological sections having a character of unity.
- The involvement of LANDSCAPE, with its components of greenery, soil, light, and water as essential materials of the project in its tension towards Beauty and harmony between the old and the new.
REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL
The disciplinary contribution is expressed in the meaning of the "economic evaluation/valorisation of the project": it consists in providing the economic-financial tools, in particular in the management key, necessary to verify the economic and financial feasibility of the intervention projects given the use of architectural assets and sites of interest and related contexts, always bearing in mind their public, private or mixed component. On these premises, in the Evaluation / Economic Valorisation module, the topics covered to address the design case according to the canonical modalities of the atelier (frontal communications with classroom exercises and multidisciplinary exercises also with the aid of computer stations and with moments of discussion and review, even collegial, of the works in progress) are as follows (strictly interrelated to the phases of the design process):
• presentation of the case study and on-site inspection,
• methods and tools of the discipline of economic evaluation, with implications on the theme of Cultural Heritage
• the VET (Total Economic Value) and the various components of the value (references)
• reference to the strategic assessment tools dealt with in the MAP Atelier I year "Project for the requalification and enhancement of the Assets" (Competitive Framework Analysis, SWOT Analysis, and SWOT Assessment, Stakeholder Mapping Methods, Estimation of Parametric Costs, Synthetic Transformation Value )
• the marketing tools of cultural heritage to identify the segments of demand and target audiences.
• the Analysis of the DEMAND to support the analysis of the investments and the feasibility of the intervention scenarios
• methods to support the choice and definition of judgments of economic convenience between alternatives also from a managerial point of view: monetary methods from the public point of view (Cost-Benefit Analysis)
• methods to support the choice and definition of judgments of economic convenience between alternatives also from a managerial point of view: monetary methods from a private point of view (Cost Revenue Analysis)
• analysis of the profitability of investments linked to transformation projects: definition of NPV, IRR, and discount rate (private projects and public projects)
• Outline methods of finding resources and financing channels (project financing, fundraising, etc...)
• Break-Even Point analysis for the analysis of the moment/management node, in the case of destinations that prefigure the provision of public cultural services
• analytical cost items relating to the management of functions: classification and quantification of management cost items, cost centres, and result areas, and any parametric indicators relating to specific functions (e.g. performance indicators).
GEOMATICS
The disciplinary contribution of the GEOMATICS sector is articulated in the introduction to the design of GIS platforms useful for spatially localizing data of different natures and time in cartographic contexts updated at the time of interest.
GIS technology is proposed as an ideal tool for presenting preliminary knowledge data to any design intervention and as a shared place for collecting the various design and hypotheses addressed from the point of view of Interior and Outfitting Architecture and Estimation.
Therefore, GIS platform is offered as a tool for knowledge and comparison of different solutions to assess their overall impact on the area of interest.
....
The teachings will be divided into:
- lectures delivered in the classroom / remotely;
- inspections;
- study trip (optional;
- classroom / remote exercises;
- disciplinary and collegial reviews of projects for single groups (generally made up of 2-3 people) in the classroom / remotely;
- collegiate presentations of projects in the classroom / remotely;
- expert testimony on specific topics in the classroom / remotely;
- classroom / remote meetings with public and private stakeholders.
INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE
- Caliari P.F., La Forma della Bellezza, Edibus, Padova, 2021 (testo obbligatorio)
- Caliari P.F., Rovina e modernità. Dialettica dell'illuminismo. pp.64-69. In S. Bigiotti, E. Corvino, (a cura di), La modernità delle rovine. Prospettive, Roma, 2015
- Caliari P.F., Valorizzazione dei beni culturali. Appunti su Villa Adriana, in M. Centanni, D. Sacco (a cura di), Villa Adriana. Memoria Storia Fortuna Futuro, Edizioni Engramma, Venezia, 2014.
- Basso Peressut L., Caliari P.F., Architettura per l'Archeologia. Museografia e Allestimento. Prospettive, Roma, 2014
- Caliari P.F., La Forma dell'Effimero. Tra Allestimento e Architettura. Compresenze di codici e sovrapposizioni di tessiture, Lybra Immagine, Milano, 2000
EVALUATION/ECONOMIC ENHANCEMENT
The teaching material presented by the teacher during the lessons (slides) is the subject of examination.
Some reference texts are not all mandatory but are strongly recommended, at least for the parts covered in the theoretical lessons and during the exercises. In case of difficulty finding the indicated texts, alternatives will be identified, or some extracts will be made available to students on the teaching portal.
It should be noted that any specific bibliographic references on in-depth topics will be indicated during the training activities and the SAL of the groups.
Concerning the issues of value and the tools of economic enhancement also from a managerial point of view:
- Coscia C., Fregonara E. (2004). Strumenti economico-estimativi nella valorizzazione delle risorse architettoniche e culturali, Celid: Torino
- Fregonara E. (2016). Valutazione sostenibilità progetto. Life cycle thinking e indirizzi internazionali, Franco Angeli: Milano
Regarding the marketing of cultural heritage
- Bollo, A., 2019. Il marketing della cultura. Carocci, Roma.
GEOMATICS
The didactic material presented by the teacher during the lessons (slides) is the subject of examination.
We also recommend some in-depth texts:
• Migliaccio Federica, Daniela Carrion. Sistemi informativi territoriali: principi e applicazioni. UTET Università, 2016.
• Neteler Markus. "GIS Open Source: GRASS GIS, Quantum GIS e SpatiaLite." (2012).
• AA.VV. – 2012 – "GIS Open Source" – Dario Flaccovio Editore
• Emanuela Caiaffa – 2011 – "ECDL GIS" – McGraw-Hill
• AA.VV. - 2009 – "Manual of Geographic Information Systems" – ASPRS
• Tor Bernhardsen – 2002 – "Geographic Information Systems: an introduction" – John Wiley & Sons – ISBN 0-471-41968-0
INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE
- Caliari P.F., La Forma della Bellezza, Edibus, Padova, 2021 (testo obbligatorio)
- Caliari P.F., Rovina e modernità. Dialettica dell'illuminismo. pp.64-69. In S. Bigiotti, E. Corvino, (a cura di), La modernità delle rovine. Prospettive, Roma, 2015
- Caliari P.F., Valorizzazione dei beni culturali. Appunti su Villa Adriana, in M. Centanni, D. Sacco (a cura di), Villa Adriana. Memoria Storia Fortuna Futuro, Edizioni Engramma, Venezia, 2014.
- Basso Peressut L., Caliari P.F., Architettura per l'Archeologia. Museografia e Allestimento. Prospettive, Roma, 2014
- Caliari P.F., La Forma dell'Effimero. Tra Allestimento e Architettura. Compresenze di codici e sovrapposizioni di tessiture, Lybra Immagine, Milano, 2000
REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL
The teaching material presented by the teacher during the lessons (slides) is the subject of examination.
Some reference texts are not all mandatory but are strongly recommended, at least for the parts covered in the theoretical lessons and during the exercises. In case of difficulty finding the indicated texts, alternatives will be identified, or some extracts will be made available to students on the teaching portal.
It should be noted that any specific bibliographic references on in-depth topics will be indicated during the training activities and the SAL of the groups.
Concerning the issues of value and the tools of economic enhancement also from a managerial point of view:
- Coscia C., Fregonara E. (2004). Strumenti economico-estimativi nella valorizzazione delle risorse architettoniche e culturali, Celid: Torino
- Fregonara E. (2016). Valutazione sostenibilità progetto. Life cycle thinking e indirizzi internazionali, Franco Angeli: Milano
Regarding the marketing of cultural heritage
- Bollo, A., 2019. Il marketing della cultura. Carocci, Roma.
GEOMATICS
The didactic material presented by the teacher during the lessons (slides) is the subject of examination.
We also recommend some in-depth texts:
• Migliaccio Federica, Daniela Carrion. Sistemi informativi territoriali: principi e applicazioni. UTET Università, 2016.
• Neteler Markus. "GIS Open Source: GRASS GIS, Quantum GIS e SpatiaLite." (2012).
• AA.VV. – 2012 – "GIS Open Source" – Dario Flaccovio Editore
• Emanuela Caiaffa – 2011 – "ECDL GIS" – McGraw-Hill
• AA.VV. - 2009 – "Manual of Geographic Information Systems" – ASPRS
• Tor Bernhardsen – 2002 – "Geographic Information Systems: an introduction" – John Wiley & Sons – ISBN 0-471-41968-0
Modalità di esame: Elaborato grafico individuale; Elaborato grafico prodotto in gruppo; Elaborato progettuale individuale; Elaborato progettuale in gruppo;
Exam: Individual graphic design project; Group graphic design project; Individual project; Group project;
...
CRITERIA
Verifying knowledge and skills will take place through intermediate classroom exercises, collegial reviews, individual oral exam and project presentation during the final oral exam.
During the exercises, the reviews, and the oral exam, the students, divided into groups and collegially, will present graphical drawings, analyses, and descriptive reports to illustrate the entire process conducted to prepare the architectural and fruition project tables. During the individual oral interview, each student will be asked to answer open questions relating to all disciplines of the Atelier.
The assessment will be based on the following criteria, attributable both to the learning path (ongoing assessments) and to the final results achieved by groups and individual students (individual contribution):
- the quality of the design solutions adopted;
- ability to integrate the tools of the various disciplines;
- completeness and correctness of the analyses carried out (with particular reference to the compatibility of the proposed solutions with the existing structures and their economic and financial feasibility);
- the ability to control the theories, methodologies and tools used;
- capacity of the contextual and socio-economic regeneration project;
- quality, clarity, and completeness of the documents;
- properties of language and effectiveness in presentations;
- critical approach in the interpretation of the results;
- problem-solving skills.
RULES AND PROCEDURES
• Individual oral exam (25% of the final evaluation)
- Presentation and discussion of the final overall work carried out by the group of students and of the individual contribution of each students to this work (75% of the final evaluation)
The project development is, in principle, to be carried out in a group (generally made up of 2-3 people). Exceptionally, it is possible to carry out the project individually in case of proven impossibility to carry it out in a group.
The working groups will produce an adequate series of graphic tables that fully illustrate the project, with progression from the general to the particular.
The introductory tables refer to the context analysis, the product of the operations of detection and restitution of the existing and the applied design models (reference architectures). The project tables will be produced according to the canonical views in orthogonal overall and detailed projection, accompanied by internal perspective views of the museum itinerary and overall external views (renderings). Specific documents will be produced to illustrate the management models applied to the project proposal.
Partial or general physical (plastic) models of the museum layout may be required.
The examination will take place in person by presenting the abovementioned printed documents, subject to a short projected presentation of the adopted design, restorative, and management principles.
All the documentation in digital format must be sent to the teacher at least two days before the oral exam.
The final mark is unique and individual, the result of the average evaluation of the individual teaching modules, considering the individual contribution to the project documents, analyses, and reports. The exam will be passed only if all teachers judge the student positively in the disciplines related to the Atelier. The tables, drawn up respecting a standard format provided by the teacher, will have to return both integrated contents of the three modules and specific contents of the single courses. These contents may be supported by in-depth documentation to be produced attached to the tables. The material must be provided in paper and digital format.
Gli studenti e le studentesse con disabilità o con Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento (DSA), oltre alla segnalazione tramite procedura informatizzata, sono invitati a comunicare anche direttamente al/la docente titolare dell'insegnamento, con un preavviso non inferiore ad una settimana dall'avvio della sessione d'esame, gli strumenti compensativi concordati con l'Unità Special Needs, al fine di permettere al/la docente la declinazione più idonea in riferimento alla specifica tipologia di esame.
Exam: Individual graphic design project; Group graphic design project; Individual project; Group project;
CRITERIA
Verifying knowledge and skills will take place through intermediate classroom exercises, collegial reviews, individual oral exam and project presentation during the final oral exam.
During the exercises, the reviews, and the oral exam, the students, divided into groups and collegially, will present graphical drawings, analyses, and descriptive reports to illustrate the entire process conducted to prepare the architectural and fruition project tables. During the individual oral interview, each student will be asked to answer open questions relating to all disciplines of the Atelier.
The assessment will be based on the following criteria, attributable both to the learning path (ongoing assessments) and to the final results achieved by groups and individual students (individual contribution):
- the quality of the design solutions adopted;
- ability to integrate the tools of the various disciplines;
- completeness and correctness of the analyses carried out (with particular reference to the compatibility of the proposed solutions with the existing structures and their economic and financial feasibility);
- the ability to control the theories, methodologies and tools used;
- capacity of the contextual and socio-economic regeneration project;
- quality, clarity, and completeness of the documents;
- properties of language and effectiveness in presentations;
- critical approach in the interpretation of the results;
- problem-solving skills.
RULES AND PROCEDURES
• Individual oral exam (25% of the final evaluation)
- Presentation and discussion of the final overall work carried out by the group of students and of the individual contribution of each students to this work (75% of the final evaluation)
The project development is, in principle, to be carried out in a group (generally made up of 2-3 people). Exceptionally, it is possible to carry out the project individually in case of proven impossibility to carry it out in a group.
The working groups will produce an adequate series of graphic tables that fully illustrate the project, with progression from the general to the particular.
The introductory tables refer to the context analysis, the product of the operations of detection and restitution of the existing and the applied design models (reference architectures). The project tables will be produced according to the canonical views in orthogonal overall and detailed projection, accompanied by internal perspective views of the museum itinerary and overall external views (renderings). Specific documents will be produced to illustrate the management models applied to the project proposal.
Partial or general physical (plastic) models of the museum layout may be required.
The examination will take place in person by presenting the abovementioned printed documents, subject to a short projected presentation of the adopted design, restorative, and management principles.
All the documentation in digital format must be sent to the teacher at least two days before the oral exam.
The final mark is unique and individual, the result of the average evaluation of the individual teaching modules, considering the individual contribution to the project documents, analyses, and reports. The exam will be passed only if all teachers judge the student positively in the disciplines related to the Atelier. The tables, drawn up respecting a standard format provided by the teacher, will have to return both integrated contents of the three modules and specific contents of the single courses. These contents may be supported by in-depth documentation to be produced attached to the tables. The material must be provided in paper and digital format.
In addition to the message sent by the online system, students with disabilities or Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) are invited to directly inform the professor in charge of the course about the special arrangements for the exam that have been agreed with the Special Needs Unit. The professor has to be informed at least one week before the beginning of the examination session in order to provide students with the most suitable arrangements for each specific type of exam.