The laboratory is the student's first contact with architectural design. The teaching is therefore proposed to provide the student with the knowledge and skills necessary to be able to recognize and design spaces at ARCHITECTURAL scale, also in relation to a deliberately simplified context and program. The articulation of the educational path in several consecutive thematic exercises allows the student to measure himself with the fundamentals of design, progressively approaching the complexity of the architectural project in its entirety. The first Atelier thus introduces the sequence of interdisciplinary design laboratories in which the Bachelor degree is structured.
The Architecture Design Studio is the student's first contact with architectural design. The teaching is therefore proposed to provide the student the knowledge and skills necessary to recognize and design spaces at the architectural scale, also in relation to a deliberately simplified context and program. The articulation of the educational path in several consecutive thematic workshop exercises allows the student to measure themselves with the fundamentals of design, progressively approaching the complexity of the architectural project. The first Design Studio thus introduces the sequence of interdisciplinary design studios in which the bachelor's degree is structured.
The knowledge and skills whose actual acquisition will be verified during the examination are structured around four thematical axes:
1 Space:
Knowledge: types and characters of the three-dimensional space
Skills: knowing how to read, break down and compose the three-dimensional space into simple units and complex configurations; know how to recognize the different types of spaces
2 Distribution characters:
Knowledge: elementary residential distributive characters
Skills: to know how to analyse the organization of circulation in simple spaces and therefore to compose elementary distribution schemes
3 Design references:
Knowledge: references for the project Skills: knowing how to recognize, choose and consciously redesign design references
4 Principles of constructive morphology:
Regarding the structure:
Knowledge: skin/structure relationship
Skills: recognizing the different possible structural configurations of a simple architecture, proposing and developing the structural form in relation to the characteristics of the space and to the organization of the distribution.
Regarding construction techniques:
Knowledge: relationship between fundamental constructive principles and architectural image Skills: recognizing and using the fundamental building principles and the architectural meaning of the specific technologies of a simple architecture, and to develop its application in coherence with the other aspects of the project.
The knowledge and skills whose actual acquisition will be verified during the examination are structured around four thematical levels:
1. Users’ needs and appropriated spaces
Knowledge: Types and characters of the three-dimensional space
Skills: Ability to identify specific functional requirements and understand the relationship between activities and spatial components.
2. Synthesis and Conceptualization
Knowledge: Ontology of architectural design
Skills: Ability to develop an abstract and concise representation of an architectural idea based on an informed reading and analysis of the specific situation.
3. Reading and understanding architectural references.
Knowledge: Disciplinary references for the project
Skills: Ability to recognize, choose, and consciously use design references for the development of complex architectural proposals.
4. Consistent materialization
Knowledge: Architectural design methodology
Skills: Ability to articulate functional, spatial, and constructive components into a coherent architectural solution.
Easily managing the fundamentals of geometric design in terms of orthogonal projections and projective geometry,
Discerning and representing scales and dimensions of architectural space through manual tools. Skilfully using the sketch as a tool for representation and conception of space.
Knowing how to make simple physical three-dimensional models with low cost and easily manipulated materials (paper, balsa, polystyrene, cardboard, plasticine etc.)
Students are asked to keep a sketch book and graphic notes from the beginning of the first semester to document his/her introduction to architecture, both through elaborations linked to the contents of the courses of the first semester, both through independent research.
The notebook will accompany the student during the atelier, documenting in graphic form the individual path of introduction to the project. The notebook is subject to evaluation during the final exam.
Familiarity with the fundamentals of geometric technical drawing regarding orthogonal projections, including knowledge of conventional architectural representation codes.
Discern and represent scales and dimensions of architectural space through hand tools. Skillfully use drawings and sketches as a tool for representing and conceiving space.
Ability to make simple three-dimensional architectural maquettes with easily manipulated materials (paper, cardboard, light wood, polystyrene, plasticine, etc.)
Basic knowledge of contemporary and 20th-century architecture.
The laboratory is developed through a sequence of 4 exercises that address, individually or transversally, the four proposed thematic axes (space, distribution, structure, techniques), referring to the interpretation of a simple architectural program, focused on to dwelling in its possible variations.
The exercises will be mainly individual, even if the organization of the atelier will include discussions and collective reviews, as well as at least one exercise or parts of exercises in groups of 3 or 4 students.
The exercises will be carried out mainly through hand drawing, both technical and freehand, and the realization of study models.
The start of the exercises will take place in the classroom, under the direction of the teachers, and it will be followed by a subsequent autonomous development by the student outside the laboratory hours, and then concluded by a check and discussion with the teacher, on a weekly basis. Therefore consistent attendance of the laboratory is strongly recommended.
The teachers will present and discuss with the students examples of significant architectures, as a whole or for specific aspects; students are required to have an independent and constant attendance of on-line and paper architecture magazines, searching for references for the different themes proposed. It is also recommended to participate in extra-curricular cultural activities organized by the College of Architecture, and to external cultural activities that can be reported by the teachers.
Each of the four exercises will last approximately three weeks. The last two weeks are dedicated to the reworking of what was done, in a final presentation (graphic tables and physical model). Coordination and exchange with the architecture design and survey laboratory can be activated both at the first and in the second semester, through joint lectures and periodic checks on the progress of the courses.
Possible common exercises in collaboration with the Culture and foundations of architectural technology course and/or with the Morphology and conception of structures course will be communicated at the beginning of the 2nd teaching period, together with the related organizational methods and times.
The Studio is developed through a sequence of exercises addressing the four thematic axes mentioned in the expected learning outcomes (Users' needs, appropriated spaces, Synthesis and Conceptualization, Reading and understanding architectural references, and Consistent materialization). As a rule, with some exceptions, exercises should be developed in groups of 2/3. All prescribed activities and assignments must be developed using hand drawing and maquette techniques; digital representations or assisted drawings cannot be used. Most of the reviews will be collective discussions to improve the awareness and critical thinking of the students.
Transversal lectures involving the course of structural morphology will be organized to improve the multidisciplinary approach and the students' constructive culture.
Living and housing, core topic of the Design Studio, will be faced through different points of view and exercises of increasing complexity all related each other and linked to the structure of 4 themes and exercises orienting all the parallel studios.
An additional main topic carried on all along the studio will be Observation, conceived as an essential skill to develop along an architect's education. To observation will be dedicated specific weekly exercises to form a thematic section of the personal notebook specifically linked to the progressing of the Studio.
Living and the spaces for living will be explored in terms of features, scale, functions and distributions as well as sensory elements and hospitality features of places, through a constant debate, commenting and comparing in class the outcomes of the different exercises among them and with selected case studies.
Hand working (sketching, drawing, collage and model making) will be the basic tool to transfer the thinking and understanding process to physical objects, easy to handle, to see from different angles, to compare and understand in their materiality.
The correct use of words, naming spaces and architectural elements, to be able to describe and understand what the students are proposing and presenting will be another essential part of the educational process. The students, gathered in small groups, will also be asked to comment some of their colleagues' works as a way to understand different proposal and to learn how to describe and synthetically comment them.
The exercises will start with the study, comparison and definition of elementary spaces through sketches and models (Exercise 1, individual).
The students will consequently enrich a chosen space as a living unit for a specific purpose, presenting and discussing possible alternatives referring to given examples of case studies (Exercise 2, individual).
The following step will be the combining of more units defining structural elements together with the Structure teacher, taking also care of an existing given context (Exercise 3, multiple solutions, group of 2/3).
The final work will be the final composition of a house, with the definition of materials and details together with the Technology teacher, developing the project defined in Ex3 relating it to its site and context (Exercise 4, multiple solutions, group of 2/3).
The Studio is structured as a sequence of exercises that will guide students toward the definition of a complex architectural project: an individual house situated in a specific context and designed for particular users.
The course is organized in two thematic parts: introduction & development, articulated by a mid-term review and exhibition.
The first part will be conducted through a series of lectures, compulsory in-class workshops, and compulsory homework assignments that will allow students to delve into the four thematic axes proposed in the program.
The second part of the semester will be conducted by reproducing the dynamics of an architectural office in which the design process is developed collectively, stimulating exchange between students and faculty and between students and students.
On a multi-sensory approach on architecture
J.Pallasmaa, The Thinking Hand. Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester 2009
L.Barello, F.Chessa, Ospitalithouse, Triennale di Milano 2018
On drawing rules
F.Cellini, Manualetto. Norme tecniche, costruttive e grafiche per lo svolgimento di una esercitazione progettuale sul tema della casa unifamiliare, Cluva-Città Studi, Venezia-Milano 1991
On dealing with spaces and places
P.Von Meiss, Elements of Architecture: From Form to Place, Taylor & Francis, 1990
H.Hertzberger, Lessons for Students in Architecture, 010 Publishers, Rotterdam 1991
A.Forty, Words and Building. A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture, Thames and Hudson, London 2004
Specific references and an additional bibliography of books and review articles will be given during the Studio.
A detailed bibliography will be provided during the semester. Reading and interpretation of specific texts will be tested during the semester, and the subject of questions during the exam.
Slides;
Lecture slides;
Modalità di esame: Prova orale obbligatoria; Elaborato grafico individuale; Elaborato grafico prodotto in gruppo;
...
The student receives a continuous feedback from the teacher on his progress through individual and group reviews.
A joint collective review of the 6 + 1 laboratories is planned, indicatively placed at the middle of the second semester, and a final exhibition of the projects, with a joint critical discussion in the presence of invited expert guests.
The exam takes place through a brief discussion of the individual project path, supported by the exhibition of the different intermediate materials produced by the student during the semester.
The evaluation will take into account the following aspects, assessed on the basis of the final and intermediate group and individual products, weighed in the final evaluation as follows:
· Ability to interpret and propose spatial configurations, 20%
· Ability to interpret and propose distribution configurations, 20%
· Ability to interpret and propose structural forms, 20%
· Ability to interpret and propose constructive systems, 20%
· Quality of representation and communication 20%
Gli studenti e le studentesse con disabilità o con Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento (DSA), oltre alla segnalazione tramite procedura informatizzata, sono invitati a comunicare anche direttamente al/la docente titolare dell'insegnamento, con un preavviso non inferiore ad una settimana dall'avvio della sessione d'esame, gli strumenti compensativi concordati con l'Unità Special Needs, al fine di permettere al/la docente la declinazione più idonea in riferimento alla specifica tipologia di esame.
The student receives continuous feedback from teaching staff on their progress through individual and collective reviews.
The exam takes place through a brief discussion of the final project, supported by the exhibition of the intermediate outcomes produced during the semester.
The evaluation will take into account the following aspects, assessed based on final and intermediate output both individually and in groups:
· Ability to interpret and propose spatial configurations related to specific users' needs
· Ability to interpret and propose clear architectural concepts
· Ability to interpret and propose consistent architectural references
· Quality and rigor of representation and communication
In addition to the message sent by the online system, students with disabilities or Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) are invited to directly inform the professor in charge of the course about the special arrangements for the exam that have been agreed with the Special Needs Unit. The professor has to be informed at least one week before the beginning of the examination session in order to provide students with the most suitable arrangements for each specific type of exam.