1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Architettura - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Meccanica (Mechanical Engineering) - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Design E Comunicazione - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Electronic And Communications Engineering (Ingegneria Elettronica E Delle Comunicazioni) - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Dei Materiali - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Architettura (Architecture) - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Aerospaziale - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Biomedica - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Civile - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Edile - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Energetica - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Meccanica - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Per L'Ambiente E Il Territorio - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Fisica - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Gestionale - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Ingegneria Gestionale - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Pianificazione Territoriale, Urbanistica E Paesaggistico-Ambientale - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Civil And Environmental Engineering - Torino 1st degree and Bachelor-level of the Bologna process in Design Sostenibile Per Il Sistema Alimentare - Torino/Parma
How can a technical object modify the way in which we interact? How do our relations change with the introduction of new technologies? Can our everyday routine prevent the diffusion of new products? What is the social impact of major infrastructural projects? Do working practices influence the way a design project is conceived and carried out?
If we think about common innovations such as the substitution of the moka with coffee-capsules machines, the diffusion of the Wii console, the use of Tinder, the diffusion of various system for the separate collection of garbage or the construction of wind farms, those above are questions that we continuously raise.
The course in Social Studies of Science and Technology intends to introduce students to approaches and methods enabling to look for answers to these questions in a systematic, rigorous and verifiable ways, so that these answers can be taken into account within the various phases of the design and engineering processes.
The course aims at providing students with competences enabling to take into account, describe, compare and discuss the ways in which projects to which they contribute can influence social relations and, on the other hand, how social relations, through which any design or engineering project unfold, can influence a project.
The course consists then in an introduction to Social Studies of Science and Technology or, more shortly, Science and Technology Studies (STS) focused on design – broadly intended – and on those methodological tools, coming from social sciences, which can be integrated within the project, in order to take into account the social complexity of what is designed.
Two will be the inquiry methods on which the course will focus: ethnography and controversy mapping. The ethnographic method consists in the direct observation of people’s behaviors within their lifeworld. It will be tackled as ethnography of designing processes, as well as ethnography of the life of artifacts.
Controversy mapping will be tackled as a tool in order to highlight the negotiating character of technological innovation and to describe specific situation where such negotiations took place.
Topics tackled along the course will be: the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT); artifacts’ capacity to act and produce effects and the ways in which all that can be described thanks to the concepts of script and de-scription; the Theory of Social Practices; the role of users; the biography of artifacts and the domestication process they go through (Domestication Theory); the shared management of innovation processes; the tracking, analysis and mapping of design controversies; the politics of technology; innovation and the related social processes.
The course will tackle such topics mainly through case studies – some introduced and discussed in class, other deepened through home reading of articles – and through home and class assignments, such as: comparison and schematization of articles; short descriptions of technical objects’ use through ethnographic observations; description of the social relations inscribed in technical objects; mapping of design controversies.
How can a technical object modify the way in which we interact? How do our relations change with the introduction of new technologies? Can our everyday routines prevent the diffusion of new products? What is the social impact of major infrastructural projects? Do working practices influence the way a design project is conceived and carried out?
If we think about common innovations such as the substitution of the moka with coffee-capsules machines, the diffusion of the Wii console, the use of Tinder, the diffusion of various system for the separate collection of garbage or the construction of wind farms, those above are questions that we continuously raise.
The course in Social Studies of Science and Technology intends to introduce students to approaches and methods enabling to look for answers to these questions in a systematic, rigorous and verifiable ways, so that these answers can be taken into account within the various phases of the design and engineering processes.
The course aims at providing students with competences enabling them to take into account, describe, compare and discuss the ways in which projects to which they (will) contribute can influence social relations and, on the other hand, how social relations, through which any design or engineering project unfolds, can influence a project.
The course consists then in an introduction to Social Studies of Science and Technology or, more shortly, Science and Technology Studies (STS) focused on design – broadly intended – and on those methodological tools, coming from social sciences, which can be integrated within engineering, architectural, product or communication design projects, in order to take into account the social complexity of what is designed.
Two will be the inquiry methods on which the course will focus: ethnography and controversy mapping. The ethnographic method consists in the direct observation of people’s behaviors within their lifeworld. Ethnography will be tackled as ethnography of designing processes, as well as ethnography of the life of artifacts.
Controversy mapping will be tackled as a tool in order to highlight the negotiating character of technological innovation and to describe specific situation where such negotiations took or takes place.
Topics tackled along the course will be: the relations between science, technology and society; artifacts’ capacity to act and produce effects and the ways in which all that can be described thanks to the concepts of script and de-scription; the biography of artifacts and the domestication process they go through (Domestication Theory); the role of users in these processes; the tracking, analysis and mapping of design controversies; the relavance of gender in relation to technology; the shared management of innovation processes considering issues like the relations between expert and lay expert knowledge, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Technlogical Assessment and especially Constructive Technological Assessment (CTA), Social Acceptance of Technologies and Infrastructures. The approaches introduced through which all these topics will be tackled are Social Construction of Technology (SCOT), the Theory of Social Practices (TSP) and, especially, Actor-Network Theory (ANT).
The course will tackle the various topics mainly through case studies – some introduced and discussed in class, other deepened through readings – and through home and class assignments, such as: comparison and schematization of articles; short descriptions of technical objects’ use through ethnographic observations; description of the social relations inscribed in technical objects; mapping of design controversies.
Students will be familiarized with notions, categories and models coming form the Social Studies of Science and Technology and with social research methods. Such familiarization does not aim to make students appropriate these notions, categories, models and methods in order to use them effectively, but in order to be able to consider them within design processes – also through the reading of scientific and specialist literature – and in order to be able to dialogue with social researcher embedded or not into the design processes.
At the end of the course students will be:
- familiar with with notions, categories and models coming form the Social Studies of Science and Technology and with social research methods.
Therefore, at the end of the course students will be able to
- look at situations that are considered mere "technical" as "socio-technical", identifying the various relations an architectural, engineering, product or communication design project take part to;
- dialogue with social scientists in relation to the projects they take part to;
- find and read social sciences articles related to the projects they take part to;
- reflect on their social role as architect, engineers or designers
The participation to the course does not require a specific propaedeutic preparation. However, the addressed topics and the required assignments presuppose a good disposition to reading, to observation and to self-observation, together with a minimal knowledge related to text editing and to the (passive) knowledge of English for some readings, as well as to a basic knowledge of computers and their main applications.
The participation to the course does not require a specific propaedeutic preparation. However, a good knowledge of English is advisable. Moreover, the addressed topics and the required assignments presuppose a good disposition to reading and to observation, together with a minimal knowledge related to text editing.
1. The relation society-technology (9)
The first part of the course intends first of all to introduce various approaches to the theorization and analysis of the relations between technology and society. From there the first part will focus on STS approaches, especially the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the Theory of Social Practice.
2. Ethnography: from faraway villages to labs to design studios (15)
The second part of the course intends to introduce ethnography as preferred method for the acquisition of knowledge within STS, first of all presenting ethnography in general, as method derived from anthropology, then showing the relevance that it has had for the development of STS and finally showing the way ethnography has been used within the study of design processes.
3. Ethnography of artifacts, script and their description (20)
The third part of the course will focus on artifacts – especially technical objects –, the way in which they act and take part to social relations and the methods used to describe these processes. Besides analyzing, through the concept of script, what technical objects make do to their users and how their configuration predispose certain social relations and prevents other ones, approaches to the biographies of objects, such as the Domestication Theory will be introduced. Domestication Theory allows understanding what happens to artifacts once they arrive into users’ households.
4. Design controversy mapping (10)
The fourth part of the course intends to introduce the issue of controversies and of their mappings, also through references to digital tools used to do such mapping as, among others, IssueCrawler and CorText.
5. Rethinking Innovation (6)
On the ground of the previous sections, in this latter one a reflection on the ways in which to think, describe and design innovation will be introduced.
1. The relation society-technology (4 frontal lecture, 12 hours)
The first part of the course intends first of all to introduce various approaches to the theorization and analysis of the relations between technology and society. From there the first part will focus on STS approaches, especially the Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and the Theory of Social Practice.
2. Ethnography: from faraway villages to labs to engineeringdesign studios (2 frontal lectures, 6 hours)
The second part of the course intends to introduce ethnography as preferred method for the acquisition of knowledge within STS, first of all presenting ethnography in general, as method derived from anthropology, then showing the relevance that it has had for the development of STS and finally showing the way ethnography has been used within the study of design processes.
3. Ethnography of artifacts and domestication processes (2 frontal lectures, 6 hours)
The third part of the course will focus on artifacts – especially technical objects –, the way in which they act and take part to social relations and the methods used to describe these processes. Besides analyzing, through the concept of script, what technical objects make do to their users and how their configuration predispose certain social relations and prevents other ones, approaches to the biographies of objects, such as the Domestication Theory will be introduced. Domestication Theory allows understanding what happens to artifacts once they arrive into users’ households.
4. Gender and technology (1 frontal lecture, 3 hours)
This is a focus on the gendered technologies and particularly on the so called gender gap.Through recent examples,we will discuss if this gap is still real or is based on old stereotypes.
5. Design controversy mapping (2 frontal lectures, 6 hours)
The fifth part of the course intends to introduce the issue of controversies and of their mappings, also through references to digital tools used to do such mapping as, among others, IssueCrawler and CorText. In this part it will be shown how controversy mapping can be useful for Constructive Technological Assessment (CTA) and Social Acceptance of Technologies and Infrastructures.
6. Rethinking Innovation (2 Frontal lectures, 6 hours)
On the ground of the previous sections, in this latter one a reflection on the ways in which to think, describe and design innovation will be introduced. It will address issues like: the shared management of innovation processes considering issues like the relations between expert and lay expert knowledge, Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Technlogical Assessment.
It is possible to do the exam as attending or non-attending.
In order to be considered attending, students need to carry out the required home assignments complying with the planned deadlines.
Although attending and non-attending students will learn the same set of notions and will reach the same expected outcomes, the bibliography is different.
It is possible to do the exam as attending or non-attending.
In order to be considered attending, students need to carry out all the required home assignments regularly, i.e. meeting the deadlines. Home assignments are around seven and all seven of them need to be completed in order to be considered as attending. Up to three delays in the submission of Home Assignments are tolerated. Failed Home Assignments are considered as delays.
Although attending and non-attending students will learn the same set of notions and will reach the same expected outcomes, the bibliography is different and the way of working is different.
Attending students work regurlarly, constantly checking their understanding through assignments in class and at home and develop their knowledge gradually, together with the other students and supervised by the teachers.
Non-attending students need to study a bibliography consisting in three books, by managing their own time and pace of learning.
The course entails home and class assignments, such: comparison and schematization of articles; short descriptions of technical objects’ use through ethnographic observations; descriptions of the social relations inscribed in technical objects; mapping of design controversies also through the use of digital applications such as IssueCrawler, CorText, etc.
For attending students
The course entails home and class assignments, such as: reading comprehension quizzes, comparison and schematization of articles; short descriptions of technical objects’ use through ethnographic observations; descriptions of the social relations inscribed in technical objects; mapping of design controversies also through the use of digital applications such as IssueCrawler, Vosviewer, CorText, etc.
Attending students need to carry out all the required home assignments, meeting the deadlines.
Each frontal lecture of 3 hours will be followed by a exercise session of 1 hour and a half, in which Class Assignments will be carried out. For each topic (1-6) there will be one or two readings, followed by reading-comprehension quizzes, which constitute Home assignments.
For non-attending students: students will manage a bibliography consisting of three book about which they will be tested at the exam.
The publications that will be used and the bibliography considered will be integrated along the course. Nevertheless, it is possible to provide a preliminary list of references
- Bijker, W., Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, the Mit Press, 1995.
- Latour B., Science in Action, Harvard University Press, 1987.
- Mattozzi A. (a cura), Il senso degli oggetti tecnici, Meltemi, 2017
- Yaneva A., Mapping Controversies in Architecture, Ashgate, 2009 or, alternatively, Lorenzet A., Il lato controverso della tecnoscienza. Nanotecnologie, biotecnologie e grandi opere nella sfera pubblica, Il Mulino, 2013.
For attending students: readings will be communicated and provided at the begininning of the course and they mainly consists in articles.
Attending students can, in any case, consider the following two as reference textbooks:
- M. Cozza, Key Concepts in Science and Technology Studies, Studentlitteratur, 2020.
- S. Sismondo, An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, Wiley, 2009.
For non attending students
- S. Sismondo, An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, Wiley, 2009
- A. Yaneva, Mapping Controversies in Architecture, Ashgate, 2009.
and one at choice among:
- I. Farias and A. Wilkie (eds.), Studio Studies, Routledge, 2016.
- D. Vinck (ed.), Everyday Engineering. The MIT Press, 2009.
- A. Yaneva, The Making of a Building, Peter Lang 2009.
Slides; Libro di testo; Esercizi;
Lecture slides; Text book; Exercises;
Modalità di esame: Prova orale obbligatoria; Elaborato scritto individuale; Elaborato scritto prodotto in gruppo; Prova scritta in aula tramite PC con l'utilizzo della piattaforma di ateneo;
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Individual essay; Group essay; Computer-based written test in class using POLITO platform;
...
For attending students: the assessment will mainly take place at the oral exam at the end of the course, when students (alone or in groups of max three persons) will present their research related to ethnography of domestication (Topic 3) or mapping of controversies (Topic 5). Two or three questions aboout the topics introduced in class (1-6) and their relation with the research carried out by the students will be asked after the students' presentation. One of the mentioned questions will make eference to the Class Assignments.
The presentation of the research carried out by students will be assessed by considering its general correctness and plausibility, as well as by considereing:
- the correct use of descripitive-analytical notions, categories and models introduced in class, especially in order to describe the mediation of artifacts in the described domestication processes or controversies;
- the correct comparative use of readings carried out during the course.
Notwithstanding the assessment's focus is on the oral exam, the successful and regular completion of home assignments is required to access the oral exam. Moreover the participation to class assignments, together with participation to class discussions, will influence the final mark for a 10% of the final mark.
Each oral exam will last around 20 minutes.
For non-attending students: the assessment will take place through a quiz, preferibly carried out through the exam.polito.it platform. The quiz consists of 15 multiple choice questions, 5 for each one of the books included in the required bibliography for non-attending students, plus 1 question requiring a medium lenght (around ten lines) open written answer and 1question requiring a short lenght (around three lines) open written answer.
As for the multiple choice questions:
- each correct answer counts as 1.2 points (total 18);
- each wrong answer counts as -1.2 points (total -18);
- each "i do not know" answer counts as 0.2 points;
- each question left unanswered counts as 0 points;
- the answer to the question requiring a short open answer counts up to 3 points
- the answer to the question requiring a medium open answer counts up to 10 points.
Total 31 points.
In order to be assessed, students needs to correctly answer at least one multiple choice question for each of the three books.
The allotted time to complete the quiz is 120 minutes. Usually students take 75 - 90 minutes to complete it
Gli studenti e le studentesse con disabilità o con Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento (DSA), oltre alla segnalazione tramite procedura informatizzata, sono invitati a comunicare anche direttamente al/la docente titolare dell'insegnamento, con un preavviso non inferiore ad una settimana dall'avvio della sessione d'esame, gli strumenti compensativi concordati con l'Unità Special Needs, al fine di permettere al/la docente la declinazione più idonea in riferimento alla specifica tipologia di esame.
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Individual essay; Group essay; Computer-based written test in class using POLITO platform;
For attending students: the assessment will mainly take place at the oral exam at the end of the course, when students (alone or in groups of max three persons) will present their research related to ethnography of domestication (Topic 3) or mapping of controversies (Topic 5). Two or three questions about the topics introduced in class (1-6) and their relation with the research carried out by the students will be asked after the students' presentation. One of the mentioned questions will make reference to Class Assignments.
The presentation of the research carried out by students will be assessed by considering its general correctness and plausibility, as well as by considereing:
- the correct use of descripitive-analytical notions, categories and models introduced in class, especially in order to describe the mediation of artifacts in the described domestication processes or controversies;
- the correct comparative use of readings carried out during the course.
Notwithstanding the assessment's focus is on the oral exam, the successful and regular completion of home assignments is required to access the oral exam. Moreover the participation to class assignments, together with participation to class discussions, will influence the final mark for a 10% of the final mark.
Each oral exam will last around 20 minutes.
For non-attending students: the assessment will take place through a quiz, preferibly carried out through the exam.polito.it platform. The quiz consists of 15 multiple choice questions, 5 for each one of the books included in the required bibliography for non-attending students, plus 1 question requiring a medium lenght (around ten lines) open written answer and 2 questions requiring a short lenght (around three lines) open written answer.
As for the multiple choice questions:
- each correct answer counts as 1.2 points (total 18);
- each wrong answer counts as -0.6 points (total -9);
- each "i do not know" answer counts as 0.2 points;
- each question left unanswered counts as 0 points;
- the answer to the questio requiring a short open answer counts up to 3 points
- the answer to the question requiring a medium open answer counts up to 10 points.
Total available points: 34.
In order to be assessed, students needs to correctly answer at least one multiple choice question for each of the three books.
The allotted time to complete the quiz is 120 minutes. Usually students take 75 - 90 minutes to complete it
In addition to the message sent by the online system, students with disabilities or Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) are invited to directly inform the professor in charge of the course about the special arrangements for the exam that have been agreed with the Special Needs Unit. The professor has to be informed at least one week before the beginning of the examination session in order to provide students with the most suitable arrangements for each specific type of exam.