Master of science-level of the Bologna process in Architettura Costruzione Citta' - Torino Master of science-level of the Bologna process in Pianificazione Urbanistica E Territoriale - Torino
The contemporary city, and in particular the urban theories that found the field of urbanism, are the core of this course, that aims to encourage students to think, because “La città contemporanea, con il proprio carattere instabile e perennemente incompiuto sollecita il dubbio, l’esplorazione, la sperimentazione” (B.Secchi, Prima lezione di Urbanistica).
We will examine positions, case studies and thoughts on the contemporary city; we will also define a framework within investigate meaningful positions in the debate on the city of the last seventy years, from postwar (WWII) till nowadays.
The course aims to introduce students to the current urbanism structure in Italy, addressing tools, techniques and urban planning policies. Consequently it deals with the current issues of the contemporary city, the organization of urban planning and design and territorial government in Italy. These topics are addressed in their multidisciplinary - territorial, landscape, energy, social and economic - and technical contents through the study of the current urban planning tools at different geographical-institutional scales.
Comparisons with European urban policies are explored during the course with references to international cases.
Two specific topics are explored in depth, and concerned respectively public spaces and their relationship with the quality of urban space and the role of town planning in addressing current urban inequalities issues.
At the end of the course we expect students to have acquired tools to contextualize urban design fields related to emerging issues of the contemporary city, as the program of the Master Degree within it is included demands.
This course aims to guide the student in the development of a critic capability, to understand the reasons that found the project of the contemporary city and the complexity that inevitably subtends it.
A wide knowledge on urban topics is at the same time at the base of this course, but also one of its objectives. A cultured designer will contribute to build visions on the city of the future, starting from a knowledge on urban theories.
At the end of the course each student must have strengthened their maturity, competence and critical ability in understanding the contemporary city - conditions, problems, and potential - and know the tools and rules that are managing its transformations, with specialist insights into the Italian case.
The students need to have acquired notions and knowledge about the traditions of contemporary European urbanism.
Notions and knowledge on the organization of contemporary European urban planning are required as required by the Urban Planning courses attended in the bachelor.
Urbanism is a complex matter that concerns the city, the environment, their controls and modifications: layered praxis that dialogue with economy, sociology, politics, laws, architecture. This is the starting point for this course.
Themes, that had been selected to understand reasons, issues, problems and theories that found the project of the contemporary city, are articulated into four modules (12 hours class for each module). The modules in turn are divided into three parts each: writings (a) – the author and the debate (b), case studies and research materials (c).
1) Give us a tool. Intellectual Grids. Team X.
1a. Writings:
- Web, by Shadrach Woods (1962);
- How to recognize and read Mat Building. Mainstream in architecture as it has developed towards a mat-
building, by Alison Smithson (1974);
1b. Research material
1c. Case studies (Candilis-Josic-Woods-Schiedhelm, Berlin Free University, 1963-1973/ Alison and Peter
Smithson, Robin Hood Garden, London, 1974-2017)
2) Experiments in freedom.
2a. Writings:
- Non-Plan: an experiment in freedom, by Paul Barker, Reyner Banham, Peter Hall (1969)
2b. Cedric Price: the author and the debate
2c. Research material: On architecture, Education and the City
2d. case study: The Fun Palace, Cedric Price (from 1961)
3) Towards a new vocabulary. Terrain Vague and Archipelago.
2a. Writings:
- The City in the City. Berlin, a Green Archipelago, by Oswald Mathis Ungers with Rem Koolhaas (1977)
- Terrain vague, by Ignasi de Sola Morales (1989)
2b. Research material
2c. Case studies (Detroit, US)
4) Public Sphere, Public space and Right to the City
3a. Writings, a selection from:
- Manuel de Solà-Morales, Public Spaces, Collective Spaces, 1992
- Herman Hertzberger, Collective space, Social use, 2002
- Bernardo Secchi, La lezione di Siena, 2005
- David Harvey, The Right to the City, 2008
- Vito Acconci, Public Space in a Private Time, 1990
3b. Case studies (Aldo van Eyck, Playgrounds, Amsterdam, 1945-1947/ Barcelona in the ‘80s, )
5) About the crisis, into the crisis
4a. Selection of the essays, articles about the most recent debate
4b. Discussions
4c. Pandemic individual exercises (I,II,III)
The topics are consistent with the statement that urban planning is a complex and heterogeneous discipline in its theoretical foundations: it concerns the city, the environment, the landscape, and the social fabric. The relationships among urbanism and economics, sociology, politics, jurisprudence, architecture, and design are carried out in the course.
In more detail: in the first part of the course the technical tools and techniques of urban planning are studied. Knowledge is therefore deepened regarding the relationships with which urbanism addresses environmental, landscape and socio-economic problems both in terms of protection and enhancement of the land use at the geographical different scales. Specialist and priority topics of current urban planning are explored in depth, such as the relationships between urban planning and socio-economic inequalities and the current priorities linked to the issues of sustainable urban development, in its energy, environmental and landscape implications as well as the evolution of urban systems from mobility to trade to income and work production systems.
This course in Urbanism is articulated into classes and into a group exercise.
Classes mean to transmit knowledge on four different programs on urban theories, to help students to be opened to a wider complexity of the urban themes, with new languages, concepts and characters.
The group exercise is based on the seminar form, to be developed in class, but not only. Books written by urbanists, architects, geographers, sociologists, economists and philosophers are meant to be a cultural baggage for the students, who are asked to read a book, to present the content in class and to write a critical essay to be published on a scientific journal.
The course is structured in lessons, reading seminars and exercises.
The lessons are organized according to a method that provides as frontal interaction as adequate interactive dialogue with the students.
The reading seminars concern the presentation and discussion of specifically selected texts, scientific articles, and technical urban design experiences.
The exercises applies the theoretical concepts to the urban analysis of a site area that are easily accessible by the students,
Guided visits to the cities of Turin and Milan could also be planned
The summary works of the readings carried out by the students will be collected in written documents (according to the editorial rules provided).
The graphic exercise it can be carried out in groups of up to 4 people, it consists of the urban analysis of a portion of the urban territory of Turin, easily accessible, the expected outcomes aim to prepare A1 maps summarizing the graphic results and a technical short report.
Concerning the reading summary sheet: each reading must be summarized by each student according to a logical scheme provided in the course, pointing up contents and thesis synthetically and concisely.
Essays of urban theory are the fundamental bibliography. They are presented in class, with other
research material.
- Stem, Shadrach Woods (1960); Web, Shadrach Woods (1962);
- Non-Plan: an experiment in freedom, di Paul Barker, Reyner Banham, Peter Hall (1969);
- How to recognize and read Mat Building. Mainstream in architecture as it has developed towards a mat-
building, Alison Smithson (1974);
- Berlin. A Green Archipelago, O.Mathias Ungers and Rem Koolhaas (1977);
- Terrain vague, Ignasi de Sola Morales (1995).
- Manuel de Solà-Morales, Public Spaces, Collective Spaces, 1992
- Herman Hertzberger, Collective space, Social use, 2002
- Bernardo Secchi, La lezione di Siena, 2005
- David Harvey, The Right to the City, 2008
- Vito Acconci, Public Space in a Private Time, 1990
Below are some texts that will be presented and discussed (the list follows the order of presentation). An annotated bibliography will also be provided for further reading.
1. Secchi Bernardo (2013) La città dei ricchi e la città dei poveri, Laterza, Roma.
2. Ellin Nan (2013), Good urbanism, Island press, London.
3. Madanipour Ali (2019), Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality, Urban Design International, 24: 38 – 46.
4. Madanipour Ali (2019), Beyond placing and distances: public spaces for inclusive cities, Harvard design magazine, 49.
5. Sendra Pablo, Sennet Richard (2020), Experiments and disruptions in the city, Verso Press, London.
6. Sassen Saskia (2018), The new inequalities within cities, in Sassen Saskia, Cities in a world economy, fifth edition, Sage New York: 235 – 273.
7. Florida Richard (2017), The inequality of cities, in Florida Richard, The new urban crisis: how our cities are increasing inequalities, deepening segregation, and failing the middle class – and what we can do about it, Basic Books, New York.
8. Mehta Suketu (2016), Continuity: what is the city if not people, three principles for a city that does not exclude, in Mehta Suketu, Secret life of cities, Penguin Books, New York.
9. Njian Jan, Wei Dennis Yehua (2020), Urban inequalities in the 21st century economy, Applied Geography 117, 102188.
Readings, lessons, technical documents will be available on the PoliTo course portal
Nessuno;
None;
Modalità di esame: Prova orale obbligatoria; Elaborato grafico prodotto in gruppo;
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Group graphic design project;
...
Students who attend the course along the semester are asked to present contents from the fundamental bibliography and their exercise at the final exam (approximately 3 questions). The evaluation will be about the group exercise (40% of the final grade) and the conversation of the final exam (60% of the final grade) .
Students who did not attend the course are asked to present the fundamental bibliography, plus another book, chosen among those of the seminar (approximately 5 questions).
Gli studenti e le studentesse con disabilità o con Disturbi Specifici di Apprendimento (DSA), oltre alla segnalazione tramite procedura informatizzata, sono invitati a comunicare anche direttamente al/la docente titolare dell'insegnamento, con un preavviso non inferiore ad una settimana dall'avvio della sessione d'esame, gli strumenti compensativi concordati con l'Unità Special Needs, al fine di permettere al/la docente la declinazione più idonea in riferimento alla specifica tipologia di esame.
Exam: Compulsory oral exam; Group graphic design project;
The exam is individual, it includes a mandatory oral test.
The oral exam includes:
(i) Verification and presentation of the reports on the readings and of the exercise (The systematic presentation of the progress along the course could be subject to evaluation)
(ii) Interview of the knowledge acquired about the topics of the course.
The evaluation criteria consider:
(i) the continuity with which the lessons were attended and the progress made in the course; punctuality in meeting expected deadlines and progress reports; the evaluation of the exercises carried out and the precision in preparing the reports on the readings and the exercise;
(ii) the technical correctness in answering the exam questions; precision in presenting the works and professionalism both in attending the lessons and in answering the exam questions.
The final grade can be different among the members of the same working group
In cases where the outcome of the exam is particularly positive, a further question is asked for the attribution of Laude
In addition to the message sent by the online system, students with disabilities or Specific Learning Disorders (SLD) are invited to directly inform the professor in charge of the course about the special arrangements for the exam that have been agreed with the Special Needs Unit. The professor has to be informed at least one week before the beginning of the examination session in order to provide students with the most suitable arrangements for each specific type of exam.